IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v66y2023i12p2536-2555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of the pre- and post-construction public opinions toward offshore wind energy on the Belgian coast

Author

Listed:
  • Justine Penneman
  • Astrid Buchmayr
  • Luc Van Ootegem
  • Elsy Verhofstadt

Abstract

Offshore wind farms are increasingly part of the modern coastal landscape and are often the reason for public opposition. To inform policymakers and to facilitate public participation strategies, the present study examines public opinion concerning offshore wind energy projects on the Belgian coast, its evolution over time and significant determinants. Public opinion is compared for three moments in time. A significant increase in acceptance was found between 2002 (planning phase prior to construction) and 2009 (turbines operational and more under construction). Acceptance remained at a high level from 2009 to 2019 with expansion still ongoing. Familiarization led to a reduction in negative attitudes. In the current population (2019), the visibility of the turbines has no influence on attitudes. Support for wind energy can be ensured when the facilities are perceived as part of the coast’s identity and when perceived impacts can be kept low.

Suggested Citation

  • Justine Penneman & Astrid Buchmayr & Luc Van Ootegem & Elsy Verhofstadt, 2023. "The evolution of the pre- and post-construction public opinions toward offshore wind energy on the Belgian coast," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2555, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:12:p:2536-2555
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2079078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2022.2079078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2022.2079078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:66:y:2023:i:12:p:2536-2555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.