IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v64y2021i6p1067-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-waste legislation in the US: An analysis of the disparate design and resulting influence on collection rates across States

Author

Listed:
  • Kelsea A. Schumacher
  • Lawrence Agbemabiese

Abstract

Electronic waste management in the US has been characterized as ‘inconsistent’, ‘disparate’, and a ‘patchwork’. While there is currently no federal leadership on the regulation of e-waste, 25 states have some form of legislation aimed at promoting e-waste recycling and/or prohibiting disposal in landfills and incinerators. But each state legislation differs from the next. We dive into these differences to unveil the complex nature of e-waste legislation in the US. Additionally, we analyze collection trends from each of the 25 legislated states. Many of these operated e-waste recycling programs prior to the implementation of state legislation, and thus we assess collection trends prior to and following legislation implementation. Our findings expose key challenges regarding the metrics used to evaluate state e-waste recycling programs as well as (re)igniting the debate on whether the states or federal government are best suited to manage e-waste in the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelsea A. Schumacher & Lawrence Agbemabiese, 2021. "E-waste legislation in the US: An analysis of the disparate design and resulting influence on collection rates across States," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(6), pages 1067-1088, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:6:p:1067-1088
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1802237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2020.1802237
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2020.1802237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelsea A. Schumacher & Martin L. Green, 2023. "Circular Economy in a High-Tech World," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 619-642, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:64:y:2021:i:6:p:1067-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.