IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v59y2016i7p1168-1185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitive issues in natural resource management and discursive strategies addressing them

Author

Listed:
  • T. Augustin Kouévi
  • Barbara van Mierlo
  • Cees Leeuwis
  • Simplice Davo Vodouhê

Abstract

In natural resource management facilitation literature, little attention is paid to sensitive issues in multi-stakeholder interaction and learning. This article aims to fill this gap. It discusses the variety of discursive strategies used by stakeholders to address sensitive issues with regard to fishery management in Benin, in three different settings: individual interviews, homogeneous groups' discussions, and a heterogeneous group meeting. Issues that proved sensitive were discussed openly in the interviews or homogeneous groups' discussions, but not at all, or only indirectly, in the heterogeneous group meeting. With indirect discursive strategies, two out of the seven sensitive issues were put on the discussions' agenda. We conclude that the other issues were too sensitive among others because of historically grown interdependency between interventionists and fishers. We suggest that dealing with sensitive issues is an important dimension of the facilitation of interactive learning processes and provide methodological guidelines to detect and address such issues.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Augustin Kouévi & Barbara van Mierlo & Cees Leeuwis & Simplice Davo Vodouhê, 2016. "Sensitive issues in natural resource management and discursive strategies addressing them," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 1168-1185, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:7:p:1168-1185
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1062746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2015.1062746
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2015.1062746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:7:p:1168-1185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.