IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v54y2011i5p685-706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural residential preferences for house design and location: insights from a discrete choice experiment applied to Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Bullock
  • Mark Scott
  • Menelaos Gkartzios

Abstract

Living in the countryside/rural areas has, in recent decades, become a matter of personal choice for many people. Various researchers have investigated people's motivations for wanting to make this move. However, there has been rather little investigation of the factors that cause people to choose one type of rural property or rural location over another. This paper reports on research undertaken in Ireland in which discrete choice experiments are combined with other survey data to examine the relative influence of factors such as house design, house location and journey times. The paper provides insights into the relative strength of such considerations, including the influence of the 'rural idyll'. The results have potential implications for planning in rural areas and the type of properties that could be needed to encourage moves to more nucleated settlements.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Bullock & Mark Scott & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2011. "Rural residential preferences for house design and location: insights from a discrete choice experiment applied to Ireland," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 685-706.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:54:y:2011:i:5:p:685-706
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.527240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640568.2010.527240
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2010.527240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rid, Wolfgang & Haider, Wolfgang & Ryffel, Andrea & Beardmore, Ben, 2018. "Visualisations in Choice Experiments: Comparing 3D Film-sequences and Still-images to Analyse Housing Development Alternatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 203-217.
    2. Caplan, Arthur J. & Akhundjanov, Sherzod B. & Toll, Kristopher, 2021. "Measuring heterogeneous preferences for residential amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Chengxiang Tang & Yucheng Zhang, 2016. "Using discrete choice experiments to value preferences for air quality improvement: the case of curbing haze in urban China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(8), pages 1473-1494, August.
    4. Schulz, Rainer & Watson, Verity & Wersing, Martin, 2023. "Teleworking and housing demand," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Iftekhar, Md Sayed & Polyakov, Maksym & Rogers, Abbie, 2022. "Social preferences for water sensitive housing features in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    6. Biancamaria Torquati & Giulia Giacchè & Tiziano Tempesta, 2020. "Landscapes and Services in Peri-Urban Areas and Choice of Housing Location: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Ida Bagus Ilham Malik & Bart Julien Dewancker, 2018. "Identification of Population Growth and Distribution, Based on Urban Zone Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Nan Liu & Deborah Roberts, 2012. "Do Incomers Pay More for Rural Housing?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1986-2005, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:54:y:2011:i:5:p:685-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.