IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v48y2005i3p445-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and Environmental Justice in South African Cities: Including 'Invisible Stakeholders' in Environmental Assessment Procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Dianne Scott
  • Catherine Oelofse

Abstract

In South Africa an intensive reform process to democratize policy, legislation and related institutions in the country commenced after the first democratic elections in 1994. While environmental law reform includes active public participation and equity principles, it is proposed in this paper that ecological modernization dominates current environmental assessment practice. This paper presents a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) of a proposed landfill on the periphery of Durban, where large informal settlements and peri-urban areas exist as a relic of apartheid planning. The methodology of the SIA was explicitly designed within a framework of social justice to include poor and marginalized people, who remain excluded from environmental decision making despite the promise of democratic equality. The study claims to deepen democratic practice by demonstrating that alternative methodologies can be designed to include the interests of 'invisible stakeholders' in environmental assessments despite the dominance of ecological modernization in the implementation of environmental law and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Dianne Scott & Catherine Oelofse, 2005. "Social and Environmental Justice in South African Cities: Including 'Invisible Stakeholders' in Environmental Assessment Procedures," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 445-467.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:48:y:2005:i:3:p:445-467
    DOI: 10.1080/09640560500067582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560500067582
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640560500067582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Healy, Hali, 2023. "Pulp and participation: Assessing the legitimacy of participatory environmental governance in Umkomaas, South Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Hayley Leck & David Simon, 2013. "Fostering Multiscalar Collaboration and Co-operation for Effective Governance of Climate Change Adaptation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1221-1238, May.
    3. Louis Celliers & Dianne Scott & Mvuselelo Ngcoya & Susan Taljaard, 2021. "Negotiation of knowledge for coastal management? Reflections from a transdisciplinary experiment in South Africa," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Moipone Rakolojane, 2014. "Waste Reclaiming in Ekurhuleni : a case study of Holomisa and Villa Lisa informal settlements in South Africa," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0800622, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    5. Clive Barnett & Dianne Scott, 2007. "Spaces of Opposition: Activism and Deliberation in Post-Apartheid Environmental Politics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2612-2631, November.
    6. Alex Aylett, 2010. "Participatory Planning, Justice, and Climate Change in Durban, South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(1), pages 99-115, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:48:y:2005:i:3:p:445-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.