IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v40y1997i2p217-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and Nitrate Sensitive Areas: A Policy and Technical Analysis of Groundwater Source Protection in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Suzie Osborn
  • Hadrian Cook

Abstract

The Nitrate Sensitive Area (NSA) scheme and the more recent Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ) scheme are responses by the British Government to the growing demands of European legislation on water quality. Both are designed to check nitrate contamination from agriculture at source, with 'polluting' activities being changed or prohibited in areas forming the catchment of waters where the 1980 European Commission (EC) limit of 50 mg/l nitrate (N) is exceeded, or is likely to be exceeded. The NVZ scheme provides protection to surface and ground water,whereas the NSA scheme relates directly to the latter. Furthermore, action programmes to reduce nitrate pollution within NVZs are mandatory and uncompensated, whilst the more strict but voluntary measures of the NSA scheme are compensated. This paper sets out to critically analyse the NVZ scheme, with reference to the NSA scheme and further makes recommendations for an improved nitrate pollution land use control policy in relation to ground water protection. The study area is Minster NVZ on the Isle of Thanet in north east Kent.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzie Osborn & Hadrian Cook, 1997. "Nitrate Vulnerable Zones and Nitrate Sensitive Areas: A Policy and Technical Analysis of Groundwater Source Protection in England and Wales," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 217-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:40:y:1997:i:2:p:217-234
    DOI: 10.1080/09640569712191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640569712191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640569712191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van der Horst, Dan, 2006. "Spatial cost-benefit thinking in multi-functional forestry; towards a framework for spatial targeting of policy interventions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 171-180, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:40:y:1997:i:2:p:217-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.