IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v47y2016i1p26-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexities in the examination of opportunity cost

Author

Listed:
  • Rod O’Donnell

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rod O’Donnell, 2016. "Complexities in the examination of opportunity cost," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 26-31, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:26-31
    DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2015.1106368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2015.1106368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220485.2015.1106368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank H. Knight, 1928. "A Suggestion for Simplifying the Statement of the General Theory of Price," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(3), pages 353-353.
    2. Frank H. Knight, 1934. ""The Common Sense of Political Economy" (Wicksteed Reprinted)," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(5), pages 660-660.
    3. Joel Potter & Shane Sanders, 2012. "Do Economists Recognize an Opportunity Cost When They See One? A Dismal Performance or an Arbitrary Concept?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(2), pages 248-256, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel Potter & Shane Sanders, 2012. "Do Economists Recognize an Opportunity Cost When They See One? A Dismal Performance or an Arbitrary Concept?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(2), pages 248-256, October.
    2. Sheetal Bharat, 2020. "Opportunity Cost: Beginning, Evolution And A Much-Needed Clarification," BASE University Working Papers 02/2020, BASE University, Bengaluru, India.
    3. William Polley, 2014. "Do students recognize an opportunity cost when they see one? Evidence from introductory economics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1550-1556.
    4. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Peter J. Boettke & Rosolino A. Candela, 2020. "Where Chicago meets London: James M. Buchanan, Virginia Political Economy, and cost theory," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 287-302, June.
    6. Daniel F. Stone, 2015. "Clarifying (Opportunity) Costs," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(1), pages 20-25, May.
    7. Eusepi Giuseppe, 1991. "Before And After “Cost And Choice”," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 135-150, March.
    8. William J. Polley, 2015. "The Rhetoric of Opportunity Cost," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(1), pages 9-19, May.
    9. Basu Sudipta & Waymire Gregory B., 2019. "Historical Cost and Conservatism Are Joint Adaptations That Help Identify Opportunity Cost," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has to Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2-3), pages 253-284, June.
    11. Daniel F. Stone, 2016. "Comments on “Opportunity cost: A reexamination”: A case in point of no free lunch," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 32-34, January.
    12. Barbieri, Fabio & Filho, Marcelo Lourenço, 2024. "From 'Tired Muscles' To 'Might-Have-Beens': A Debate On The Nature Of Costs In The Late 19th Century," SocArXiv gshwz, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:26-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.