IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecprf/v19y2016i4p327-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does economic freedom increase income inequality? Evidence from the EU countries

Author

Listed:
  • Salvador Pérez-Moreno
  • María J. Angulo-Guerrero

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between economic liberalization and income inequality in the EU using panel data for the 2000s. The empirical evidence suggests that economic freedom is strongly related to income inequality. However, not all areas of economic freedom affect income distribution similarly. Government size is robustly associated with inequality, and also when controlling for potential endogeneity in a dynamic panel data analysis. Regulation is linked to income inequality as well, whereas legal system and sound money have no significant effects on income distribution. In the case of freedom to trade internationally, the relationship differs between old (EU-15) and new (former socialist) EU countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvador Pérez-Moreno & María J. Angulo-Guerrero, 2016. "Does economic freedom increase income inequality? Evidence from the EU countries," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 327-347, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecprf:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:327-347
    DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2015.1128832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17487870.2015.1128832
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17487870.2015.1128832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berisha, Edmond & Chisadza, Carolyn & Clance, Matthew & Gupta, Rangan, 2021. "Income inequality and oil resources: Panel evidence from the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Olalekan Charles Okunlola & Anthony E. Akinlo, 2021. "Does economic freedom enhance quality of life in Africa?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 68(3), pages 357-387, September.
    3. Islam, Md. Rabiul, 2018. "Wealth inequality, democracy and economic freedom," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 920-935.
    4. Mduduzi Biyase & Carolyn Chisadza, 2023. "Symmetric and asymmetric effects of financial deepening on income inequality in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 961-978, September.
    5. Huynh, Cong Minh & Le, Quoc Nha, 2022. "A multi-dimensional free market and income inequality in developing Asia: How does the quality of governance matter?," MPRA Paper 112013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Johan, Sofia & Sakariyahu, Rilwan & Lawal, Rodiat & Paterson, Audrey & Ajide, Folorunsho M., 2023. "Does energy poverty moderate the impact of economic freedom on the quality of life in Africa? A panel quantile via moment approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    7. Ali Sarkhosh-Sara & Khadije Nasrollahi & Karim Azarbayjani & Rasul Bakhshi Dastjerdi, 2020. "Comparative analysis of the effects of institutional factors and Piketty’s Hypothesis on inequality: evidence from a panel of countries," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Hadsell, Lester & Jones, Adam T, 2020. "The company you keep: Satisfaction with life, economic freedom, and preference-policy mismatch," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 642-657.
    9. Huynh, Cong Minh & Le, Quoc Nha & Lam, Thi Huong Tra, 2023. "Is air pollution a government failure or a market failure? Global evidence from a multi-dimensional analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecprf:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:327-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GPRE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.