IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v48y2012i11p1683-1697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safeguarding Common-Pool Resources in Transition Economies: Experimental Evidence from Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Mark Rosenbaum
  • Stephan Billinger
  • Nils Stieglitz

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that the propensity to cooperate in common pool resource dilemmas is higher for small, homogeneous groups with efficacious monitoring and sanctioning mechanisms. Given that transition from socialist to market economies is associated with larger, more heterogeneous groups with diluted opportunities for monitoring and sanctioning, individuals in later-stage transition economies may be expected to be less cooperative than their early-stage counterparts. However, evidence from experiments conducted with subjects in two economies at different stages of transition suggests that this may not be the case. These findings have implications for both theorists and practitioners alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Mark Rosenbaum & Stephan Billinger & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Safeguarding Common-Pool Resources in Transition Economies: Experimental Evidence from Central Asia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1683-1697, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:48:y:2012:i:11:p:1683-1697
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2012.693169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2012.693169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2012.693169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Zeitler, 2005. "Between Russia and China - Central Asia’s Transition Experience," Working Papers 258, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    2. Alam, Asad & Banerji, Arup, 2000. "Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan - a tale of two transition paths," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2472, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inkyo Cheong & Valijon Turakulov, 2022. "How Central Asia to Escape from trade isolation?: Policy targeted scenarios by CGE modelling," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 2622-2648, August.
    2. Lord, Montague, 2005. "Economic Growth in Uzbekistan: Sources and Potential," MPRA Paper 50731, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ranaweera,Thilakaratna, 2003. "Alternative paths to structural adjustment in Uzbekistan in a three-gap framework," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3145, The World Bank.
    4. Maxim Kan, 2023. "Sustained and Universal Fertility Recuperation in Kazakhstan," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 1-39, December.
    5. Kobil Ruziev & Toshtemir Majidov, 2013. "Differing Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on the Central Asian Countries: Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Uzbekistan," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(4), pages 682-716.
    6. Ranaweera, Thilak, 2003. "Market disequilibria and inflation in Uzbekistan, 1994-2000," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3144, The World Bank.
    7. Heidelbach, Olaf, 2007. "Efficiency of selected risk management instruments: An empirical analysis of risk reduction in Kazakhstani crop production," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 40, number 92323, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:48:y:2012:i:11:p:1683-1697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.