IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v9y2017i2p263-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative research and the evaluation of development impact: incorporating authenticity into the assessment of rigour

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Johnson
  • Saltanat Rasulova

Abstract

Renewed attention is being paid to the quality of qualitative research in studies of development impact in the wake of intense debate over the role of randomised control trials. These debates raised the bar over quality while also provoking concerns about whose voices matter and the politics of evidence-based policymaking. This article argues that both of these issues can be addressed through Guba and Lincoln’s trustworthiness criteria, and particularly the principle of authenticity which was developed to respond to demands for research to be transformative and emancipatory. Adopting these criteria in commissioned evaluations as checklist, ‘artefacts’ are a means to improve rigour and raise ethical standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Johnson & Saltanat Rasulova, 2017. "Qualitative research and the evaluation of development impact: incorporating authenticity into the assessment of rigour," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 263-276, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:263-276
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2017.1306577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2017.1306577
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2017.1306577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schuster, Roseanne C. & Brewis, Alexandra & Wutich, Amber & Safi, Christelle & Vanrespaille, Teresa Elegido & Bowen, Gina & SturtzSreetharan, Cindi & McDaniel, Anne & Ochandarena, Peggy, 2023. "Individual interviews versus focus groups for evaluations of international development programs: Systematic testing of method performance to elicit sensitive information in a justice study in Haiti," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Soheila Shamsikhani & Fazlollah Ahmadi & Anoshirvan Kazemnejad & Mojtaba Vaismoradi, 2021. "Typology of Family Support in Home Care for Iranian Older People: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Sylvain K Cibangu, 2018. "Misunderstandings of Capability Approach: Towards Paradigm Pluralism," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 9(2), pages 54-72.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:263-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.