IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v5y2013i3p359-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do for-profit microfinance institutions achieve better financial efficiency and social impact? A generalised estimating equations panel data approach

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Louis
  • Bart Baesens

Abstract

This article contributes to the literature by investigating the potential benefits of the commercialisation of microfinance. Two types of possible improvements of pursuing profitability are investigated using a comprehensive longitudinal data set spanning 15 periods and covering 456 microfinance institutions (MFIs). The analyses are done using a generalised estimating equations framework in order to correct for the correlations within each cluster. The results show that we cannot support the hypothesis that operating more financially efficient is associated with being registered as for-profit MFIs. With respect to social impact, a lower depth of outreach and less outreach to women are associated with for-profit registration.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Louis & Bart Baesens, 2013. "Do for-profit microfinance institutions achieve better financial efficiency and social impact? A generalised estimating equations panel data approach," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 359-380, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:359-380
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2013.822015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2013.822015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2013.822015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Mak Arvin & Byron Lew (ed.), 2015. "Handbook on the Economics of Foreign Aid," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15762.
    2. Ahmad, Syedah & Lensink, Robert & Mueller, Annika, 2020. "The double bottom line of microfinance: A global comparison between conventional and Islamic microfinance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. Maxime LEBOVICS & Niels HERMES & Marek HUDON, 2016. "Are Financial And Social Efficiency Mutually Exclusive? A Case Study Of Vietnamese Microfinance Institutions," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 87(1), pages 55-77, December.
    4. Pavitra Dhamija, 2022. "South Africa in the era of Industry 4.0: An Insightful Investigation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5083-5110, September.
    5. Ernest Gyapong & Daniel Gyimah & Ammad Ahmed, 2021. "Religiosity, borrower gender and loan losses in microfinance institutions: a global evidence," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 657-692, August.
    6. Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Damla Diriker & Paolo Landoni & Davide Moro & Mahinda Wijesiri, 2024. "Financial and social sustainability in the European microfinance sector," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1249-1292, October.
    7. Niels Hermes & Marek Hudon, 2018. "Determinants Of The Performance Of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1483-1513, December.
    8. Crispin John Mbogo, 2024. "Effects of Transformation on Outreach Performance of Microfinance NGOs in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(2), pages 1972-1987, February.
    9. Hermes, Cornelis & Hudon, M., 2018. "Determinants of the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review," Research Report 2018008, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:359-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.