IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v17y2025i1p21-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does social protection reach those left behind: empirical evidence from Botswana using multidimensional poverty approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Khaufelo Raymond Lekobane
  • Giel Ton

Abstract

Social protection policies are important for advancing the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, especially the call to leave no one behind. We employ multidimensional poverty measures to identify those left behind. Using data from the 2015/16 Botswana Multi-Topic Household Survey, this study compares the targeting performance of selected social assistance programmes according to: (a) the specific programme eligibility criteria; (b) the monetary poverty measure; and (c) the multidimensional poverty index. The overall results reveal high inclusion and exclusion error rates among most programmes, indicating that they perform poorly in reaching their intended beneficiaries. The results also reveal high under-coverage rates irrespective of the poverty measure used. However, when the programmes are ranked according to leakage rates, the results differ across the two poverty measures. Relying on the monetary poverty measure alone may send inadequate information to policymakers tasked with reforming Botswana’s national social protection policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaufelo Raymond Lekobane & Giel Ton, 2025. "Does social protection reach those left behind: empirical evidence from Botswana using multidimensional poverty approaches," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 21-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:21-35
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2024.2355635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2024.2355635
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2024.2355635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:21-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.