IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v16y2024i3p363-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research transparency and reproducibility policies and programmes at the international initiative for impact evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Grant
  • Sayak Khatua

Abstract

Research transparency and reproducibility can improve the credibility of scientific evidence on development effectiveness and the utility of this evidence for decision-making. As a funder and producer of research on development effectiveness, the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) has several policies and programmes that aim to improve research transparency and reproducibility. This manuscript provides a descriptive overview of the history-to-date of research transparency and reproducibility policies and programmes at 3ie. In 2012, 3ie launched its Replication Programme to incentivise replication of impact evaluations in international development. In 2014, 3ie created the Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations to provide infrastructure for the prospective registration of impact evaluations of development interventions. In 2018, 3ie published its first Research Transparency Policy articulating requirements on the use of open science practices in research activities. In 2022, 3ie created the Transparent, Reproducible, and Ethical Evidence (TREE) Review Framework, which integrates best practices for research transparency and reproducibility into evaluation workflows. This manuscript provides stakeholders in development effectiveness specifically – as well as research grant managers and other organisations in the scientific ecosystem more generally – a descriptive example of institutional efforts to continuously improve research transparency and reproducibility policies and programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Grant & Sayak Khatua, 2024. "Research transparency and reproducibility policies and programmes at the international initiative for impact evaluation," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 363-373, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:363-373
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2024.2388102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2024.2388102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2024.2388102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:363-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.