IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v16y2024i2p206-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inadequate teacher content knowledge and what could be done about it: evidence from El Salvador

Author

Listed:
  • Aymo Brunetti
  • Konstantin Büchel
  • Martina Jakob
  • Ben Jann
  • Daniel Steffen

Abstract

Good teachers are the backbone of a successful education system. Yet, in developing countries, teachers’ content knowledge is often inadequate. This study documents that primary school maths teachers in the department of Morazán in El Salvador only master 47 percent of the curriculum they teach. In a randomised controlled trial with 175 teachers, we further evaluate a computer-assisted learning (CAL) approach to address this shortcoming. After a five months in-service training combining CAL-based self-studying with monthly workshops, participating teachers outperformed their peers from the control group by 0.29$\sigma $σ, but this effect depreciated by 72 percent within one year. Our simulations show that the program is unlikely to be as cost-effective as CAL interventions directly targeting students.

Suggested Citation

  • Aymo Brunetti & Konstantin Büchel & Martina Jakob & Ben Jann & Daniel Steffen, 2024. "Inadequate teacher content knowledge and what could be done about it: evidence from El Salvador," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 206-229, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:206-229
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2023.2213681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2023.2213681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2023.2213681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:206-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.