IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v17y2024i3p331-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On debt obligations as market relations: the entanglement of debtors in market organization

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Nir

Abstract

Over the past decade, debt-based solutions have been implemented as part of austerity policies to distribute public goods by the use of market forces, resulting in an increase in public and private indebtedness. This paper considers the terms of such solutions by developing the conceptual lens of market studies to rethink ‘debt’ and ‘the market’ as analytical categories that often reproduce the conditions of their conceptual boundaries. In so doing, it demonstrates how paying attention to particularities reveals the normative, economic and political circumstances that determine debt-based solutions. These do not simply sit peripheral to the market, but come to define debt obligations as part of market relations. In this respect, the paper takes an approach that accounts for obligation as an entanglement of debtors in market relations. The study builds on Michel Callon’s rendition of ‘problematization’ to explore the implementation of the 2010 higher education fee loan regime in England, a result of austerity governance. A novel application of ‘markets for collective concern’ and ‘accountability devices’ is thus used to argue that understanding the ways debt-based solutions entangle market participants in the obligation to repay that reproduces the conditions of the intervention’s conceptual boundaries, requires a market studies approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Nir, 2024. "On debt obligations as market relations: the entanglement of debtors in market organization," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 331-344, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:331-344
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2023.2287132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2023.2287132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2023.2287132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:17:y:2024:i:3:p:331-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.