IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v51y2024i10p1861-1877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple comparisons of treatment against control under unequal variances using parametric bootstrap

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Alver
  • Guoyi Zhang

Abstract

In one-way analysis of variance models, performing simultaneous multiple comparisons of treatment groups with a control group may be of interest. Dunnett's test is used to test such differences and assumes equal variances of the response variable for each group. This assumption is not always met even after transformation. A parametric bootstrap (PB) method is developed here for comparing multiple treatment group means against the control group with unequal variances and unbalanced data. In simulation studies, the proposed method outperformed Dunnett's test in controlling the type I error under various settings, particularly when data have heteroscedastic variance and unbalanced design. Simulations show that power is often lower for the PB method than for Dunnett's test under equal variance, balanced data, or smaller sample size, but similar to or higher than for Dunnett's test with unequal variance, unbalanced data and larger sample size. The method is applied to a dataset concerning isotope levels found in elephant tusks from various geographical areas. These data have very unbalanced group sizes and unequal variances. This example illustrates that the PB method is easy to implement and avoids the need for transforming data to meet the equal variance assumption, simplifying interpretation of results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Alver & Guoyi Zhang, 2024. "Multiple comparisons of treatment against control under unequal variances using parametric bootstrap," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(10), pages 1861-1877, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:51:y:2024:i:10:p:1861-1877
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2023.2245179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2023.2245179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2023.2245179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:51:y:2024:i:10:p:1861-1877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.