IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v49y2022i10p2700-2716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the discriminatory power of loss given default models

Author

Listed:
  • Hannes Kazianka
  • Anna Morgenbesser
  • Thomas Nowak

Abstract

For banks using the Advanced Internal Ratings-Based Approach in accordance with Basel III requirements, the amount of required regulatory capital relies on the banks' estimates of the probability of default, the loss given default and the conversion factor for their credit risk portfolio. Therefore, for both model development and validation, assessing the models' predictive and discriminatory abilities is of key importance in order to ensure an adequate quantification of risk. This paper compares different measures of discriminatory power suitable for multi-class target variables such as in loss given default (LGD) models, which are currently used among banks and supervisory authorities. This analysis highlights the disadvantages of using measures that solely rely on pairwise comparisons when applied in a multi-class setting. Thus, for multi-class classification problems, we suggest using a generalisation of the well-known area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve known as the volume under the ROC surface (VUS). Furthermore, we present the R-package VUROCS, which allows for a time-efficient computation of the VUS as well as associated (co)variance estimates and illustrate its usage based on real-world loss data and validation principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannes Kazianka & Anna Morgenbesser & Thomas Nowak, 2022. "Assessing the discriminatory power of loss given default models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(10), pages 2700-2716, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:49:y:2022:i:10:p:2700-2716
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1910936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2021.1910936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2021.1910936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:49:y:2022:i:10:p:2700-2716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.