IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v44y2017i8p1350-1368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of asymmetric stochastic volatility models under different correlation structures

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongxian Men
  • Don McLeish
  • Adam W. Kolkiewicz
  • Tony S. Wirjanto

Abstract

This paper conducts simulation-based comparison of several stochastic volatility models with leverage effects. Two new variants of asymmetric stochastic volatility models, which are subject to a logarithmic transformation on the squared asset returns, are proposed. The leverage effect is introduced into the model through correlation either between the innovations of the observation equation and the latent process, or between the logarithm of squared asset returns and the latent process. Suitable Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms are developed for parameter estimation and model comparison. Simulation results show that our proposed formulation of the leverage effect and the accompanying inference methods give rise to reasonable parameter estimates. Applications to two data sets uncover a negative correlation (which can be interpreted as a leverage effect) between the observed returns and volatilities, and a negative correlation between the logarithm of squared returns and volatilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongxian Men & Don McLeish & Adam W. Kolkiewicz & Tony S. Wirjanto, 2017. "Comparison of asymmetric stochastic volatility models under different correlation structures," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1350-1368, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:44:y:2017:i:8:p:1350-1368
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1204596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2016.1204596
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2016.1204596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Cheol Woo & Kang, Kyu Ho, 2023. "Estimating and testing skewness in a stochastic volatility model," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 445-467.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:44:y:2017:i:8:p:1350-1368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.