IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v43y2016i9p1738-1752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One-sided asymptotic inferences for a proportion

Author

Listed:
  • M. Álvarez Hernández
  • A. Martín Andrés
  • I. Herranz Tejedor

Abstract

Two-sided asymptotic confidence intervals for an unknown proportion p have been the subject of a great deal of literature. Surprisingly, there are very few papers devoted, like this article, to the case of one tail, despite its great importance in practice and the fact that its behavior is usually different from that of the case with two tails. This paper evaluates 47 methods and concludes that (1) the optimal method is the classic Wilson method with a correction for continuity and (2) a simpler option, almost as good as the first, is the new adjusted Wald method (Wald's classic method applied to the data increased in the values proposed by Borkowf: adding a single imaginary failure or success).

Suggested Citation

  • M. Álvarez Hernández & A. Martín Andrés & I. Herranz Tejedor, 2016. "One-sided asymptotic inferences for a proportion," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1738-1752, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:43:y:2016:i:9:p:1738-1752
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1117595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2015.1117595
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2015.1117595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andres, A. Martin & Mato, A. Silva, 1994. "Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 555-574, June.
    2. Price, Robert M. & Bonett, Douglas G., 2004. "An improved confidence interval for a linear function of binomial proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 449-456, April.
    3. A. Andrés & M. Sánchez Quevedo & J. Tapia García & A. Silva-Mato, 2005. "On the validity condition of the chi-squared test in 2×2 tables," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 14(1), pages 99-128, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hothorn Ludwig A & Sill Martin & Schaarschmidt Frank, 2010. "Evaluation of Incidence Rates in Pre-Clinical Studies Using a Williams-Type Procedure," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Andres, A. Martin & Mato, A. Silva, 1996. "Optimal correction for continuity and conditions for validity in the unconditional chi-squared test," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 609-626, June.
    3. Martin Andres, A. & Herranz Tejedor, I., 2004. "Exact unconditional non-classical tests on the difference of two proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 373-388, March.
    4. Andres, A. Martin & Tejedor, I. Herranz, 1995. "Is Fisher's exact test very conservative?," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 579-591, May.
    5. Martin Andres, A. & Mato, A. Silva & Garcia, J. M. Tapia & Quevedo, M. J. Sanchez, 2004. "Comparing the asymptotic power of exact tests in 2x2 tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 745-756, November.
    6. Skipka, G. & Munk, A. & Freitag, G., 2004. "Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities--contrasted and compared," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 757-773, November.
    7. Boris Freidlin & Joseph L. Gastwirth, 1999. "Unconditional Versions of Several Tests Commonly Used in the Analysis of Contingency Tables," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 264-267, March.
    8. Devan V. Mehrotra & Ivan S. F. Chan & Roger L. Berger, 2003. "A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 441-450, June.
    9. José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes & Tulsi Sagar Sheth & José Fernando Vera-Vera, 2024. "Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Martin Andres, A. & Sanchez Quevedo, M. J. & Silva Mato, A., 1998. "Fisher's Mid-P-value arrangement in 2x2 Comparative trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 107-115, November.
    11. Eugene Seneta & Geoffrey Berry & Petra Macaskill, 1999. "Adjustment to Lancaster's Mid-P," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 229-240, September.
    12. Douglas G. Bonett & Robert M. Price, 2012. "Adjusted Wald Confidence Interval for a Difference of Binomial Proportions Based on Paired Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(4), pages 479-488, August.
    13. Phipps, Mary C. & Byron, Peter M., 2007. "A filter for "confidence interval P-values"," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6435-6446, August.
    14. A. Martín Andrés & M. Álvarez Hernández, 2015. "Simultaneous inferences: new method of maximum combination," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1099-1113, November.
    15. Zou, Guang Yong & Huang, Wenyi & Zhang, Xiaohe, 2009. "A note on confidence interval estimation for a linear function of binomial proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1080-1085, February.
    16. Guha, Debashis & Hiris, Lorene, 2002. "The aggregate credit spread and the business cycle," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 219-227.
    17. Andres, Martin & Garcia, Tapia, 1999. "Optimal unconditional test in 2x2 multinomial trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 311-321, September.
    18. Munk, A. & Skipka, G. & Stratmann, B., 2005. "Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case--asymptotic theory and exact procedures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 723-739, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:43:y:2016:i:9:p:1738-1752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.