IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v32y2005i5p461-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The most-cited statistical papers

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Ryan
  • William Woodall

Abstract

We attempt to identify the 25 most-cited statistical papers, providing some brief commentary on each paper on our list. This list consists, to a great extent, of papers that are on non-parametric methods, have applications in the life sciences, or deal with the multiple comparisons problem. We also list the most-cited papers published in 1993 or later. In contrast to the overall most-cited papers, these are predominately papers on Bayesian methods and wavelets. We briefly discuss some of the issues involved in the use of citation counts.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Ryan & William Woodall, 2005. "The most-cited statistical papers," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 461-474.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:32:y:2005:i:5:p:461-474
    DOI: 10.1080/02664760500079373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02664760500079373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664760500079373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theoharakis V. & Skordia M., 2003. "How Do Statisticians Perceive Statistics Journals?," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 57, pages 115-123, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erjen Van Nierop, 2009. "Why do statistics journals have low impact factors?," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(1), pages 52-62, February.
    2. Laurent Linnemer & Michael Visser, 2016. "The Most Cited Articles from the Top-5 Journals (1991-2015)," CESifo Working Paper Series 5999, CESifo.
    3. Nadeem Shafique Butt & Ahmad Azam Malik & Muhammad Qaiser Shahbaz, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Statistics Journals Indexed in Web of Science Under Emerging Source Citation Index," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    4. Francesca De Battisti & Alfio Ferrara & Silvia Salini, 2015. "A decade of research in statistics: a topic model approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 413-433, May.
    5. Pedro Galeano & Daniel Peña, 2019. "Data science, big data and statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 289-329, June.
    6. Thomas A. Hamrick & Ronald D. Fricker & Gerald G. Brown, 2010. "Assessing What Distinguishes Highly Cited from Less-Cited Papers Published in Interfaces," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 454-464, December.
    7. Christina C. Bartenschlager & Michael Krapp, 2015. "Theorie und Methoden multipler statistischer Vergleiche," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 9(2), pages 107-129, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    2. Dimitris Bertsimas & Erik Brynjolfsson & Shachar Reichman & John Silberholz, 2015. "OR Forum—Tenure Analytics: Models for Predicting Research Impact," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1246-1261, December.
    3. Apostolos Ballas & Vasilis Theoharakis, 2003. "Exploring Diversity in Accounting through Faculty Journal Perceptions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 619-644, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Citations; history of statistics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:32:y:2005:i:5:p:461-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.