IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/irapec/v26y2012i6p811-827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing economic complexity as interindustry connectedness in nine OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • João C. Lopes
  • João Dias
  • João F. Amaral

Abstract

Economic complexity can be defined as the level of interdependence between the component parts of an economy. In input--output systems interindustry connectedness is a crucial feature of analysis, and there are many different methods of measuring it. Most of the measures however, have important drawbacks to be used as a good indicator of economic complexity, because they were not explicitly made with this purpose in mind. In this paper, we present, discuss and compare empirically different indexes of economic complexity as intersectoral connectedness, using the inter-industry tables of nine OECD countries. According to most of the measures of connectedness large economies (USA, Japan) tend to be more complex than small economies (for example, Denmark). But if another type of measures is considered, the opposite conclusion is drawn, signalling a hidden characteristic of interdependence that so far has not been detected by conventional measures. This result should qualify the widespread idea that more interconnected productive structures propagate more intensely exogenous shocks and/or economic policy measures.

Suggested Citation

  • João C. Lopes & João Dias & João F. Amaral, 2012. "Assessing economic complexity as interindustry connectedness in nine OECD countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 811-827, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:26:y:2012:i:6:p:811-827
    DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2012.665852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02692171.2012.665852
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02692171.2012.665852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R C Jensen & G R West, 1980. "The Effect of Relative Coefficient Size on Input—Output Multipliers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 12(6), pages 659-670, June.
    2. Chokri Dridi & Geoffrey Hewings, 2002. "An Investigation of Industry Associations, Association Loops and Economic Complexity: Application to Canada and the United States," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 275-296.
    3. R Basu & T G Johnson, 1996. "The Development of a Measure of Intersectoral Connectedness by Using Structural Path Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(4), pages 709-730, April.
    4. Ana Salome Garcia Muniz & Antonio Morillas Raya & Carmen Ramos Carvajal, 2008. "Key Sectors: A New Proposal from Network Theory," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1013-1030.
    5. J M Szyrmer, 1985. "Measuring Connectedness of input-output Models: 1. Survey of the Measures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(12), pages 1591-1612, December.
    6. Fidel Aroche-Reyes, 2003. "A qualitative input-output method to find basic economic structures," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 581-590, November.
    7. Michael Sonis & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 1998. "original: Economic complexity as network complication: Multiregional input-output structural path analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(3), pages 407-436.
    8. Chiou-shuang Yan & Edward Ames, 1965. "Economic Interrelatedness," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 32(4), pages 299-310.
    9. Peter Midmore & Max Munday & Annette Roberts, 2006. "Assessing industry linkages using regional input-output tables," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 329-343.
    10. Alan T. Peacock & Douglas Dosser, 1957. "Input-Output Analysis in an Underdeveloped Country: A Case Study," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 21-24.
    11. Thakur, Sudhir K., 2008. "Identification of temporal fundamental economic structure (FES) of India: An input-output and cross-entropy analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 132-151, June.
    12. Reiner Wolff, 2005. "A global robustness measure for input-output projections from ESA and SNA tables," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 77-93.
    13. J. M. Blin & Frederic Murphy, 1974. "On Measuring Economic Interrelatedness," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(3), pages 437-440.
    14. João Ferreira do Amaral & João Dias & João Carlos Lopes, 2007. "Complexity as Interdependence in Input–Output Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1770-1782, July.
    15. Erik Dietzenbacher & Isidoro Romero, 2007. "Production Chains in an Interregional Framework: Identification by Means of Average Propagation Lengths," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 362-383, October.
    16. Yasuhide Okuyama, 2007. "Economic Modeling for Disaster Impact Analysis: Past, Present, and Future," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 115-124.
    17. Dietzenbacher, Erik, 1992. "The measurement of interindustry linkages : Key sectors in the Netherlands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 419-437, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antoine GODIN & Alvaro MORENO & Diego GUEVARA & Jhan ANDRADE & Christos PIERROS & Devrim YILMAZ & Sebastian VALDECANTOS, 2022. "Thinking macroeconomic vulnerabilities in the context of low-carbon transition," Working Paper f033267a-4c36-4ee0-8e3b-7, Agence française de développement.
    2. García Muñiz, Ana Salomé & Ramos Carvajal, Carmen, 2012. "Linkages, contagion and resilience: an input-output scope from the demand and supply side," MPRA Paper 59369, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Aroche-Reyes, Fidel & García Muñiz, Ana Salomé, 2012. "Modelling economic structures from a Qualitative Input-Output Perspective: Greece in 2005 and 2010," MPRA Paper 44415, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Bashir, Muhammad Farhan & MA, Benjiang & Hussain, Hafezali Iqbal & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Koca, Kemal & Shahzadi, Irum, 2022. "Evaluating environmental commitments to COP21 and the role of economic complexity, renewable energy, financial development, urbanization, and energy innovation: Empirical evidence from the RCEP countr," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 541-550.
    5. Ana Salome GARCIA MUÑIZ & Carmen RAMOS CARVAJAL, 2015. "Input-Output Linkages And Network Contagion In Greece:Demand And Supply View," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 15(2), pages 35-52.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liis LILL, 2008. "Assessing Economic Complexity in some OECD countries with Input-Output Based Measures," EcoMod2008 23800082, EcoMod.
    2. Martha Alatriste-Contreras, 2015. "The relationship between the key sectors in the european union economy and the intra-European Union trade," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. García Muñiz, Ana Salomé, 2013. "Input–output research in structural equivalence: Extracting paths and similarities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 796-803.
    4. GARCIA-MUÑIZ, Ana Salome, 2013. "Modelling Linkages Versus Leakages Networks: The Case Of Spain," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(1), pages 43-54.
    5. Llop, Maria & Ponce-Alifonso, Xavier, 2015. "Identifying the role of final consumption in structural path analysis: An application to water uses," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 203-210.
    6. Deborah Roberts & David Newlands, 2010. "The Economic Integration of New Sectors in Rural Areas: A Case Study of the Shetland Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
    7. Francisco Miguel & Maria Llop & Antonio Manresa, 2014. "Sectoral productivity gains in two regional economies: key sectors from a supply-side perspective," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(3), pages 731-744, November.
    8. Santadas Ghosh & Joyashree Roy, 1998. "Qualitative Input-Output Analysis of the Indian Economic Structure," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 263-274.
    9. Martha G. Alatriste-Contreras & Igor Lugo, 2022. "Strategic sectors and the diffusion of the effect of a shock in Mexico for 2008 and 2012," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Jorge Manuel Lopez & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete, 2015. "Andalusian Economic Structure over Social Accounting Matrices from FES analysis perspective," ERSA conference papers ersa15p523, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Titze, Mirko & Brachert, Matthias & Kubis, Alexander, 2008. "The Identification of Regional Industrial Clusters Using Qualitative Input-Output Analysis," IWH Discussion Papers 13/2008, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    12. Elvio Mattioli e Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica, 2012. "Degree of integration and activation power of tourism in the European countries� economies: an input-output analysis," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 66(2), pages 57-72.
    13. João Ferreira do Amaral & João Dias & João Carlos Lopes, 2007. "Complexity as Interdependence in Input–Output Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1770-1782, July.
    14. Miguel Vélez, Francisco Javier de & Llop Llop, Maria & Manresa, Antonio, 1954-, 2013. "Supply Multipliers in Two Regional Economies," Working Papers 2072/213636, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    15. Raffaele Giammetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2020. "Key sectors in input–output production networks: An application to Brexit," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 840-870, April.
    16. Thurlow, James & Yang, Ling & Lahr, Michael L., 2012. "The (Declining) Role of Households in Sustaining China's Economy: Structural Path Analysis for 1997-2007," WIDER Working Paper Series 083, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Malcolm Beynon & Calvin Jones & Max Munday, 2009. "The Embeddedness of Tourism-related Activity: A Regional Analysis of Sectoral Linkages," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2123-2141, September.
    18. Miguel, Francisco Javier de & Llop Llop, Maria & Manresa, Antonio, 1954-, 2011. "Simulating the Impact of Sectorial Productivity Gains on Two Regional Economies: Key Sectors from a Supply Side Perspective," Working Papers 2072/169681, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    19. Henrique Morrone, 2018. "Which Sectors To Stimulate First In Brazil? Estimating The Sectoral Power To Pull The Economy Out Of The Recession," Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 44th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 95, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    20. Mirko Titze & Matthias Brachert & Alexander Kubis, 2011. "The Identification of Regional Industrial Clusters Using Qualitative Input-Output Analysis (QIOA)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 89-102.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:26:y:2012:i:6:p:811-827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIRA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.