IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v21y2021i1p138-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impediments and opportunities for growing the cooperative housing sector: an Australian case study

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Crabtree
  • Neil Perry
  • Sidsel Grimstad
  • Joanne McNeill

Abstract

In many countries, housing cooperatives are longstanding and stable components of housing systems, providing a range of housing options that sit between the historically dual tenure poles of renting and owning. In others, such as Australia, cooperatives represent a very small proportion of total housing stock. Such differences derive from institutional lock-in resulting from market failures, government policy and historical norms. Breaking the institutional lock-in requires evidence of the benefits of cooperative housing to demonstrate the rationale for appropriate policy frameworks. However, despite their longevity in some countries, cooperatives remain relatively under-researched, such that their purported benefits as compared to other tenure forms can be hard to assess or compare. This article provides a brief synthesis of extant literature on the benefits of cooperatives before focusing on Australia where the sector is poised for growth from a very small base. We consider the impediments and opportunities for growing the sector in Australia, which highlight issues of potential relevance to other jurisdictions with similarly nascent cooperative sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Crabtree & Neil Perry & Sidsel Grimstad & Joanne McNeill, 2021. "Impediments and opportunities for growing the cooperative housing sector: an Australian case study," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 138-152, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:138-152
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2019.1658916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2019.1658916
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2019.1658916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:138-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.