IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v20y2020i3p390-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘House to let’: housing agents, social networks and Ghana’s housing law and policy

Author

Listed:
  • John Windie Ansah
  • Dorothy Takyiakwaa
  • Edward Atakora
  • Michael Amoah

Abstract

This paper explores the entanglements between housing agents, their social networks and the current rental housing regulatory framework in Ghana. Using purely qualitative methods, the paper sought primary data from 42 housing agents, one Rent Control Department officer, 10 landlords and 15 tenants, and secondary data from government related policies and reports to uncover the nuances of housing agency in Ghana and their relevance to the housing regulatory and policy frameworks. Using narrative analysis, we draw on the social capital theory to uncover how social networks, trust and norms of reciprocity shape activities and strategies of housing agents towards both productive and conflict ridden outcomes. The paper argues that the organisation of activities of housing agents is an exercise of power mobilised through an elaborately informal but orderly social networks underlined by social trust and norms. We contend that such patterns of activities of housing agents founded on the elements of social capital produce both economic and administrative values to the state which could be adapted, refined and incorporated into the current housing regulations and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • John Windie Ansah & Dorothy Takyiakwaa & Edward Atakora & Michael Amoah, 2020. "‘House to let’: housing agents, social networks and Ghana’s housing law and policy," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 390-416, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:20:y:2020:i:3:p:390-416
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2020.1712760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2020.1712760
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2020.1712760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:20:y:2020:i:3:p:390-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.