IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v19y2019i2p165-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homeownership and residential stability: does tenure really make a difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Aarland
  • Carolina K. Reid

Abstract

Homeownership has long been associated with a myriad of economic, social and civic benefits, prompting countries such as Norway to expand access to homeownership for socio-economically disadvantaged households. In this paper, we explore the impact of homeownership on residential stability using a longitudinal data-set of renters who applied for a state mortgage programme in Norway between 2004 and 2010. These data allow us to specifically address the issue of selection bias in our analysis. We find that even after controlling for a wide range of demographic, socio-economic and housing market characteristics, homeownership has a substantial, positive impact on residential stability. This effect is stronger for groups that are more marginalised in Norwegian housing and labour markets, including East European and non-Western immigrants. The Norwegian case suggests homeownership policy can help to promote social goals, but also highlights the importance of providing welfare supports in tandem with access to mortgage credit in order to reduce the risks of homeownership for lower-income households.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Aarland & Carolina K. Reid, 2019. "Homeownership and residential stability: does tenure really make a difference?," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 165-191, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:19:y:2019:i:2:p:165-191
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1397927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2017.1397927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2017.1397927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ke Wang & Jianjun Zhang & Wenhua Guo & Zhen Liu & Ze Xu, 2023. "A Perception and Judgement of Contributing Factors for Allocating Urban Residential Land: A Systematic Review and Statistical Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:19:y:2019:i:2:p:165-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.