IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v12y2012i1p47-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homes as Old Age Security? Households’ Perceptions of Housing and Elderly Care in Finland and Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Päivi Naumanen
  • Pedro Perista
  • Hannu Ruonavaara

Abstract

This paper investigates homeowners’ views on housing and elderly care in two urban localities in Finland and Portugal. A special emphasis is put on the perception of old-age care arrangements and the role of housing equity in providing security. Our qualitative interview data focuses on the shared frameworks of understanding through which interviewees make sense of these issues. Given the socio-cultural differences between the two countries, it can be expected that these frameworks would be rather different. The Finnish welfare state endorses the ideals of the Nordic welfare model, such as universal benefits, high coverage and public provision. Portugal represents the Mediterranean model where the family and the third sector are central in providing welfare and the state's role is more limited. Therefore, one could hypothesise that Portuguese interviewees regard old-age care mostly outside the scope of the state, with stronger inputs from the family than Finnish interviewees. Additionally, within the perspective of home as the locus of family solidarity and intergenerational transfers, equity withdrawal would be understood more negatively whereas Finnish households would see it more positively emphasising the benefits it gives to the individual.

Suggested Citation

  • Päivi Naumanen & Pedro Perista & Hannu Ruonavaara, 2012. "Homes as Old Age Security? Households’ Perceptions of Housing and Elderly Care in Finland and Portugal," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 47-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:12:y:2012:i:1:p:47-68
    DOI: 10.1080/14616718.2012.651322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14616718.2012.651322
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14616718.2012.651322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:12:y:2012:i:1:p:47-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.