IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v10y2010i4p421-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Private Rented Sectors in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland: A Case Study in Convergence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aideen Hayden
  • Paddy Gray
  • Ursula McAnulty
  • Chris O’Malley
  • Bob Jordan

Abstract

The theme of this paper centres on the divergence and convergence of housing policy in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, as reflected in the development of the private rented sector (PRS) in both jurisdictions. Using a historical comparative analysis of key indicators, this paper aims not just to present an accurate picture of the state of policy towards the PRS in both jurisdictions, but to situate this analysis within the overall development of the two housing systems. The paper postulates that while Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland are both reflective of the Anglo-Saxon tradition in housing, historical factors have led to different housing pathways and clearly identifiable differences in policy outcomes. Housing policy and housing tenure mix in both jurisdictions diverged significantly during the twentieth century, showing examples of path dependency at work, but there is clear evidence of convergence in recent decades. The withdrawal from direct social housing provision and the changing role of the private rented sector are examined and an example of convergence theory at work is analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aideen Hayden & Paddy Gray & Ursula McAnulty & Chris O’Malley & Bob Jordan, 2010. "The Private Rented Sectors in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland: A Case Study in Convergence Analysis," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 421-441.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:421-441
    DOI: 10.1080/14616718.2010.526404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14616718.2010.526404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14616718.2010.526404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:421-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.