IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v24y2024i3p357-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betting flexibly: the utilization of knowledge in cockfighting in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Fumiko Morota

Abstract

This paper explores how people make decisions to bet in cockfighting in the Philippines. Although extensive research has addressed skill and luck in gambling, mainly from a psychological standpoint, relatively little attention has been given to the ways in which gamblers adeptly manipulate these aspects to guide their betting practices. To reveal the complexity and dynamics of such practices, this study illustrates how extensive knowledge, particularly that related to roosters and luck, is applied in making betting decisions through an ethnographic methodology based on participant observation in three sites and interviews with six cockfighters. By coding the obtained data, broadly three approaches are revealed in their betting behavior: business-oriented mind, rooster evaluation, and luck control. The main findings are that while using accumulated knowledge of roosters to make informed bets is a legitimate strategy, experiencing a series of defeats motivates cockfighters to consider the role of luck and take steps to manage its fluctuations. Their betting decisions emerge in the relationships among cockfighters, roosters, and the environment of the cockpit. This connection between the human and non-human is constantly in flux, thereby leading to the generation and transformation of the knowledge relied upon by cockfighters in each bet.

Suggested Citation

  • Fumiko Morota, 2024. "Betting flexibly: the utilization of knowledge in cockfighting in the Philippines," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 357-372, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:24:y:2024:i:3:p:357-372
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2023.2297678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2023.2297678
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2023.2297678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:24:y:2024:i:3:p:357-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.