Author
Listed:
- Seema Mutti-Packer
- Hyoun S. Kim
- Daniel S. McGrath
- Emma V. Ritchie
- Michael J. A. Wohl
- Matthew Rockloff
- David C. Hodgins
Abstract
The current study examined the emotional and cognitive evaluations as well as the perceived efficacy of fear-based, text-only pop-up messages. The pop-up messages were presented when viewing a 3-minute prerecorded video of online roulette play. Fifty-nine people who gamble online viewed both low- and high-threat messages that reflected, by random assignment, either the financial (n= 27) or social (n= 32) consequences of gambling. Participants then reported their emotional and cognitive evaluations of the messages, as well as their perceived efficacy to facilitate responsible gambling. Eye-tracking was used as an objective measure of attention to the message. A 2 (message theme: social, financial) x 2 (threat level: low, high) mixed-model ANOVA was used to examine the evaluations and efficacy of the messages. The main effects of message theme/threat level were not significant. The 2 × 2 interaction for the outcome of overall effectiveness was significant, whereby the high-threat and social message combination was rated more effective than other combinations. For eye-tracking, there were no significant findings. The results suggest that fear-based social messaging may be more effective than non-fear inducing or financially-oriented messages. Further research can explore if messages that are perceived to be effective likewise lead to lower-risk gambling.
Suggested Citation
Seema Mutti-Packer & Hyoun S. Kim & Daniel S. McGrath & Emma V. Ritchie & Michael J. A. Wohl & Matthew Rockloff & David C. Hodgins, 2022.
"An experiment on the perceived efficacy of fear-based messages in online roulette,"
International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 480-498, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:intgms:v:22:y:2022:i:3:p:480-498
DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2022.2038655
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:22:y:2022:i:3:p:480-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.