IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v21y2021i1p103-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of sequential winning vs. losing on subsequent gambling behavior: analysis of empirical data from casino baccarat players

Author

Listed:
  • Nobuhito Abe
  • Ryusuke Nakai
  • Kuniaki Yanagisawa
  • Toshiya Murai
  • Sakiko Yoshikawa

Abstract

Problem gambling is characterized by intense urges to repeatedly engage in gambling and is highly deleterious to individuals’ financial and social well-being. A fundamental issue in problem gambling is how repeated and risky betting behavior varies as a function of outcome history. We used empirical data on gamblers playing baccarat, one of the most popular casino games, to examine the effects of sequential winning versus losing on subsequent gambling behavior. Specifically, we analyzed data from 7,935,566 games played by 3,986 players at a land-based casino to examine changes in the betting amount and in the rate of betting on hands with different dividend rates according to prior consecutive wins or losses. The results revealed that the bet amount in baccarat gradually increased according to streak length, and this effect was more pronounced after sequential winning than after sequential losing. The proportions of multiple bets, including ‘longshots’ – hands with low winning percentages and high dividend rates – decreased after sequential losing but increased after sequential winning. The present study, as the first attempt to analyze a large dataset on baccarat betting, indicates that gamblers shift their gambling behavior to be more reckless after experiencing consecutive wins more than consecutive losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Nobuhito Abe & Ryusuke Nakai & Kuniaki Yanagisawa & Toshiya Murai & Sakiko Yoshikawa, 2021. "Effects of sequential winning vs. losing on subsequent gambling behavior: analysis of empirical data from casino baccarat players," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 103-118, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:103-118
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2020.1817969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2020.1817969
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2020.1817969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:103-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.