IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v18y2018i3p477-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family violence in gambling help-seeking populations

Author

Listed:
  • Katie Palmer du Preez
  • Maria Bellringer
  • Janet Pearson
  • Nicki Dowling
  • Aino Suomi
  • Jane Koziol-Mclain
  • Denise Wilson
  • Alun Jackson

Abstract

Elevated rates of family violence among treatment-seeking problem gamblers compared to general population estimates have been reported in Spain, Canada and Australia. This study examined the occurrence of family violence among 454 problem gambling help-seeking clients (370 gamblers, 84 affected others) recruited through 3 national gambling treatment services in New Zealand. Measures used were the Problem Gambling Severity Index, and a modified version of the HITS Scale which assessed physical, emotional, verbal and sexual abuse. Past-year family violence among gamblers in this sample was 46.8% for victimization, 41.2% for perpetration and 55.0% for any form of family violence. Among affected others the occurrence was 65.5% for victimization, 57.1% for perpetration and 71.4% for any form of violence. The most common type of violence was verbal intimate partner violence. Affected others and women gamblers reported higher rates of violence victimization and perpetration. These findings underscore the importance of screening gambling help-seeking clients for family violence, and the development of prevention and treatment programmes to address violence in this population, with particular attention to affected others and women gamblers. Future research should assess coercive control and the gendered nature of family violence among problem gambling help-seekers.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie Palmer du Preez & Maria Bellringer & Janet Pearson & Nicki Dowling & Aino Suomi & Jane Koziol-Mclain & Denise Wilson & Alun Jackson, 2018. "Family violence in gambling help-seeking populations," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 477-494, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:18:y:2018:i:3:p:477-494
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2018.1480648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2018.1480648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2018.1480648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:18:y:2018:i:3:p:477-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.