Author
Listed:
- Demet Özocakli
- Berna Doğan Başar
- İbrahim Halil Ekşi
- William Ginn
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of the Grain Corridor Agreement (GCA), particularly in the aftermath of the Russia–Ukraine conflict, on the prices of major grains (wheat, maize, and barley), pivotal for global sustenance. By delineating three significant shocks: the initiation of the conflict, the enforcement of the GCA, and Russia's subsequent withdrawal from it, we employ an Integrated GARCH (IGARCH) model to investigate the impact of the Russia–Ukraine conflict on grain prices. Our empirical findings reveal that all grain prices surged at the onset of the conflict, with barley experiencing the most pronounced increase. Additionally, volatility escalated across all grain prices during the conflict's inception, albeit subsiding upon the implementation of the GCA. Price volatility spiked initially but decreased with the GCA's enforcement. The evidence suggests that the conflict is driving up world grain prices and causing global vulnerability, and that conciliatory policies such as the GCA offer a short-term solution. However, long-term strategies should focus on reducing external dependence by reviewing agricultural policies and promoting domestic production. Moreover, policymakers are advised to consider both domestic and global market vulnerabilities when designing sound policies.Highlights International grain prices (wheat, maize and barley) spiked during the onset of the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict.The conflict triggered an international response to resume safe maritime humanitarian transportation of agricultural grains via GCA.We develop an empirical framework to assess the impact of the Russia–Ukraine conflict on grain prices.Empirical findings indicate that Russia–Ukraine conflict increased all grain prices.
Suggested Citation
Demet Özocakli & Berna Doğan Başar & İbrahim Halil Ekşi & William Ginn, 2024.
"Effect of Grain Corridor Agreement on Grain Prices,"
International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 489-506, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:intecj:v:38:y:2024:i:3:p:489-506
DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2024.2372764
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:38:y:2024:i:3:p:489-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.