IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v32y2025i2p197-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration and the termination of inventions: the role of the structure of the firm’s knowledge base and its failure experience

Author

Listed:
  • Arusyak Zakaryan

Abstract

Firms manage their R&D portfolios by continuously evaluating and selecting which inventive paths to maintain and which ones to terminate. Prior research found that the extent of exploration in an invention increases the invention’s likelihood of termination. We inquire about organisational contingencies that impact the evaluation and selection of exploratory inventions. We suggest that the structure of an organisation’s knowledge base and its failure experience are particularly relevant for better comprehending the conditions under which exploratory inventions are more or less likely to be terminated. We find that the positive effect of exploration on patent termination is weakened with increasing level of decomposability in organisation’s knowledge base and increasing failure experience but only up to the moderate levels of these moderating variables. Empirically, we examine patent maintenance decisions in the biopharmaceutical industry. We discuss the contributions of our study for the research on exploration, invention termination, knowledge networks and failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Arusyak Zakaryan, 2025. "Exploration and the termination of inventions: the role of the structure of the firm’s knowledge base and its failure experience," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 197-228, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:197-228
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2024.2376313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2024.2376313
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2024.2376313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:197-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.