IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v31y2024i7p859-895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital capability gaps in traditional industries: influencing factors and strategic responses

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Hanel
  • Martin Friesl

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of digital capability gaps (DCG); the relative difference of a firm’s ability to design and control products, services, and processes by utilising digital technologies in relation to customers and partners. These DCGs matter as they affect SME’s strategic responses and the value-creating relationships. Our findings reveal that strategic responses differ according to the magnitude of DCGs: Large DCGs may offer the opportunity for ‘digital diversification’ by using the capabilities developed to enter new domains. In cases of moderate DCGs, firms respond by adopting the role of a ‘digital parent’ and innovate on behalf of customers. Finally, in the cases of small DCGs, firms may respond by forming ‘digital collaborations.’ Our study also unpacks the influencing factors that affect DCGs: the consolidation or fragmentation of customer portfolio and competitive landscape and the extent to which players have a similar digital pressure for adopting digital capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Hanel & Martin Friesl, 2024. "Digital capability gaps in traditional industries: influencing factors and strategic responses," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 859-895, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:7:p:859-895
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2024.2340625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2024.2340625
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2024.2340625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:7:p:859-895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.