Author
Abstract
In this interview article, we explore the research journey of Bernhard Lingens, Veronika Seeholzer, and Oliver Gassmann, whose work on ‘The architecture of innovation: how firms configure different types of complementarities in emerging ecosystems’ earned them the 2024 Industry and Innovation Best Paper Award. This study stands out for its significant contribution to understanding the complexities of ecosystem management, offering valuable insights into how firms strategically navigate complementarities to foster innovation. The interview delves into the motivations behind their research, revealing the driving questions that led them to explore this under-researched area. The authors discuss their findings, particularly how the initial configuration of complementarities can dictate the developmental trajectory of an ecosystem, making these early decisions crucial for long-term success. They also share the practical implications of their work, emphasising its relevance for today’s fast-paced business environment, where firms must adapt quickly to remain competitive. The authors candidly discuss the challenges they encountered during the research and writing process, including the difficulties of translating practitioner-focused insights into academic discourse. They reflect on the importance of generating actionable knowledge that can be directly applied to management practice, highlighting the path-dependent nature of ecosystem development and the vital role of initial strategic decisions. This interview not only underscores the distinctive aspects of their award-winning paper but also offers valuable guidance for young researchers aspiring to make a meaningful impact in the fields of management and innovation studies, ensuring their work remains relevant and practically applicable.
Suggested Citation
Enrique Acebo, 2024.
"Exploring the foundations of ‘the architecture of innovation: how firms configure different types of complementarities in emerging ecosystems’,"
Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(10), pages 1235-1239, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:10:p:1235-1239
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2024.2420776
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:10:p:1235-1239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.