IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ijecbs/v32y2025i1p31-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UK Productivity Puzzle: A Survey of the Literature and Expert Views

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Williams
  • Anthony J. Glass
  • Madeleine Matos
  • Thomas Elder
  • David Arnett

Abstract

Since 2008, the UK’s productivity has stagnated, leading to the widely debated “productivity puzzle”. Understanding this phenomenon and its drivers is crucial for managers and policymakers. This article summarises theoretical and empirical literature on the determinants of productivity in general terms, as well as their relevance to the UK’s productivity performance. It also discusses to what extent the findings from a survey of leading UK academic experts on productivity provide support for the existing theoretical and empirical evidence on this topic, and help identify and validate the most important factors explaining the UK’s productivity slowdown since 2008. The combination of our literature review and survey findings suggests that key determinants of the UK’s productivity slowdown include: insufficient investment; insufficient quality of infrastructure; limitations in human capital stock; and management quality issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Williams & Anthony J. Glass & Madeleine Matos & Thomas Elder & David Arnett, 2025. "The UK Productivity Puzzle: A Survey of the Literature and Expert Views," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 31-65, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:31-65
    DOI: 10.1080/13571516.2024.2367818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13571516.2024.2367818
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13571516.2024.2367818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:32:y:2025:i:1:p:31-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIJB20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.