IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v26y2025i1p141-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysts’ Recommendations and Press Sentiment: Complementary or Alternative to Drive Investors’ Trading Behavior?

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Ferretti
  • Enrico Rubaltelli
  • Andrea Sciandra

Abstract

This paper focuses on the relationship between financial analysts’ recommendations and press sentiment from the perspective of the attention-grabbing theory. Specifically, attention-grabbing should not be enough to explain the effect that media coverage has on investment decisions, since investors are wary of making a mistake and anticipate the regret of a future loss. Our case study pertains to a column reporting on secondhand information and analysts’ recommendations. Once the column did not report the analysts’ advice anymore, we hypothesized investors also assess the sentiment of the column to make sure they are not making a costly mistake. Event studies on abnormal returns and multivariate analyses show that for columns with explicit analysts’ recommendations the attention-grabbing mechanism directs buying decisions while has no influences on selling decision. In the absence of explicit recommendations, investors transform the columns’ content into implicit recommendations leading their buying decisions when the sentiment is highly positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Ferretti & Enrico Rubaltelli & Andrea Sciandra, 2025. "Analysts’ Recommendations and Press Sentiment: Complementary or Alternative to Drive Investors’ Trading Behavior?," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 141-153, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:141-153
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2023.2257342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2023.2257342
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2023.2257342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:141-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.