IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v20y2019i4p424-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Annual Report Sentiment as a Proxy for Financial Distress in U.S. Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Priyank Gandhi
  • Tim Loughran
  • Bill McDonald

Abstract

Current measures of bank distress find marginal value in predictive variables beyond a capital adequacy ratio and tend to miss extreme events impacting the entire sector. The authors advocate a new proxy for bank distress: sentiment measures from banks’ annual reports. After controlling for popular forecasting variables used in the literature, they find that more negative sentiment in the annual report is associated with larger delisting probabilities, lower odds of paying subsequent dividends, higher subsequent loan loss provisions, and lower future return on assets. The findings suggest that regulators could augment current early warning systems for banks and the banking sector—where the measures are based exclusively on financial statement data—by using the frequency of negative words in banks’ annual reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyank Gandhi & Tim Loughran & Bill McDonald, 2019. "Using Annual Report Sentiment as a Proxy for Financial Distress in U.S. Banks," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 424-436, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:20:y:2019:i:4:p:424-436
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2019.1553176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2019.1553176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2019.1553176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:20:y:2019:i:4:p:424-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.