IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v20y2019i3p255-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Willingness and Perceived Utilities to Explain Risky Investment Choices: A Behavioral Model

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Y. K. Cheng

Abstract

The author develops a descriptive behavioral model to explain investment choices in risky assets. Relative to many expected utility theories, the model has advances in some concepts: (a) integrated risk preferences along a continuum of risk willingness, with specific considerations to probabilities of both gains and losses, thus distinguishing risk-averse from risk-venturous investors; (b) third and fourth order of risk preferences corresponding to third and fourth moments of distributions of asset returns; (c) heterogeneous perceived utilities with utilitarian, hedonic, social, and risk-willing dimensions; and (d) risk-willing utilities functions for gains and losses, specifically to explain the observed asymmetries in risk preferences between them. The author discusses the qualitative factors that affect investors’ behavior in risky choices, but still explains their decisions with the traditional concept of utilities. The author validates his model qualitatively against Tversky and Kahneman’s [1992] criteria of an adequate descriptive theory of choice before he concludes.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Y. K. Cheng, 2019. "Risk Willingness and Perceived Utilities to Explain Risky Investment Choices: A Behavioral Model," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 255-266, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:255-266
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2018.1506785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2018.1506785
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2018.1506785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:20:y:2019:i:3:p:255-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.