IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v18y2017i1p14-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Dissonance as an Explanation of Goodwill Write-Offs

Author

Listed:
  • Sohyung Kim
  • Darlene Bay

Abstract

While agency theory has been an important part of accounting academic research, many researchers have suggested that other theories should also be considered. One such theory is the theory of cognitive dissonance. In this study, the authors develop competing hypotheses based on agency theory and the theory of cognitive dissonance regarding the decision to record an impairment of goodwill. Using an archival research methodology, they test the hypotheses on a sample of 2,274 firm-year observations. The results are consistent with the theory of cognitive dissonance even after controlling for variables that have been found to be significant under agency theory. The authors conclude that there is strong evidence to suggest that agency theory does not uniquely explain the results of management decisions as seen through financial reporting data.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohyung Kim & Darlene Bay, 2017. "Cognitive Dissonance as an Explanation of Goodwill Write-Offs," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 14-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:18:y:2017:i:1:p:14-28
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2017.1274755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2017.1274755
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2017.1274755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:18:y:2017:i:1:p:14-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.