Author
Listed:
- Rafael Weißbach
- Lucas Radloff
- Constantin Reinke
- G. Doblhammer
Abstract
A continuous-time multi-state history is semi-Markovian, if an intensity to migrate from one state into a second, depends on the duration in the first state. Such duration can be formalised as marker, entering the intensity process of the transition counts. We derive the intensity process, prove its predictability and the martingale property of the residual to the integrated intensity. In particular, we verify the usual conditions for the respective filtration. As a consequence, according to Nielsen and Linton (1995), a kernel estimator of the transition intensity, including the duration dependence, converges point-wise at a slow rate, compared to the fast rate of the Markovian kernel estimator, i.e. when ignoring duration dependence. By using the inequality of the two rates, we follow Gozalo (1993) and show that the (properly penalised) maximal difference of the two kernel estimators on a random grid of points is asymptotically $ \chi ^2_1 $ χ12-distributed. As compared to the $ \chi ^2 $ χ2 goodness-of-fit test on a fixed grid, with less power, the estimator of the variance needs to be shown to converge uniformly. The data example is a sample of 130,000 German women, observed over a period of 10 years, and we model the intensity to die with dementia, potentially dependent on the disease duration. As usual, the models under the null and the alternative hypothesis need to be enlarged to allow for independent right-censoring. We find a significant effect of dementia duration, nearly independent of the bandwidth. A Monte Carlo simulation confirms level and high power of the test with the penalised maximal difference, under the conditions of our application. It also reminds that hyperparameter selection is sensitive to the application.
Suggested Citation
Rafael Weißbach & Lucas Radloff & Constantin Reinke & G. Doblhammer, 2024.
"A powerful nonparametric test of the effect of dementia duration on mortality,"
Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 1225-1257, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:1225-1257
DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2024.2320128
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:1225-1257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.