IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v51y2025i1p138-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do birds of a feather deter better? Cultural affinity and alliance deterrence

Author

Listed:
  • Saera Lee
  • Addison Huygens
  • Sara McLaughlin Mitchell

Abstract

Using a new latent measure of cultural affinity in military alliances (1816–2011), this study shows that states are less likely to be targets of militarized disputes or wars if they are members of defensive alliances with more culturally similar states. The theory posits that alliances between culturally similar states are designed with rules and norms that reflect the community’s shared interests, which helps the members handle intra-alliance conflicts, and strengthens the overall credibility of the agreements, deterring attacks on outside members. Empirical analyses of politically relevant dyads with alliance ties shows that cultural affinity provides deterrence benefits in alliances between democracies (e.g., NATO) or between autocracies (e.g., Arab League, Gulf Cooperation Council) and that the deterrence results are strongest for potential targets that are non-democratic.

Suggested Citation

  • Saera Lee & Addison Huygens & Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2025. "Do birds of a feather deter better? Cultural affinity and alliance deterrence," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 138-160, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:1:p:138-160
    DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2024.2441664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2024.2441664
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050629.2024.2441664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:51:y:2025:i:1:p:138-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.