Author
Listed:
- Srinivas Arukonda
- Ramalingaswamy Cheruku
Abstract
Effective disease diagnosis is a critical unmet need on a global scale. The intricacies of the numerous disease mechanisms and underlying symptoms make developing a model for early diagnosis and effective treatment extremely difficult. Machine learning (ML) can help to solve some of these issues. Recently, various ensemble-based ML models have benefited clinicians in early diagnosis. However, one of the most difficult challenges in multi-level ensemble approaches is the classifier selection and their placement in the ensemble framework as it improves the overall performance. Let m classifiers have to select from n classifiers there are (nm) ways. Again, these (nm) possibilities can be arranged in m! ways. Finding the best m classifiers and their positions from total (nm)m! ways is a challenging and hard problem. To address this challenge, a dynamic three-level ensemble framework is proposed. A nested Genetic Algorithm (GA) and ensemble-based fitness function are employed to optimize the classifier selection and their placement in a three-level ensemble framework. Our approach used eleven classifiers and chose seven classifiers by maximizing the fitness function. The proposed model experiments on 12 disease datasets. The proposed model outperformed in terms of accuracy, F1, and G-measure on the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) dataset is 0.987, 0.988, and 0.989, respectively. In terms of AUC on the Heart disease dataset (HDD) is 0.998 and in terms of recall on the Hypothyroid disease dataset (HyDD) is 0.988. In addition, the proposed model superiority is statically evaluated by Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank (WSR) test compared with other ensemble models, such as random forest (RF), bagging classifier (BC), XGBoost (XGB), and gradient boost classifier (GBC) with probability value p
Suggested Citation
Srinivas Arukonda & Ramalingaswamy Cheruku, 2025.
"Nested genetic algorithm-based classifier selection and placement in multi-level ensemble framework for effective disease diagnosis,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 487-510, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:487-510
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2294264
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:487-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.