IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v28y2025i4p477-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a radiation free numerical modelling framework to predict spring assisted correction of scaphocephaly

Author

Listed:
  • Begona Garate Andikoetxea
  • Sara Ajami
  • Naiara Rodriguez-Florez
  • N. U. Owase Jeelani
  • David Dunaway
  • Silvia Schievano
  • Alessandro Borghi

Abstract

Sagittal Craniosynostosis (SC) is a congenital craniofacial malformation, involving premature sagittal suture ossification; spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) – insertion of metallic distractors for skull reshaping – is an established method for treating SC. Surgical outcomes are predictable using numerical modelling, however published methods rely on computed tomography (CT) scans availability, which are not routinely performed. We investigated a simplified method, based on radiation-free 3D stereophotogrammetry scans. Eight SAC patients (age 5.1 ± 0.4 months) with preoperative CT and 3D stereophotogrammetry scans were included. Information on osteotomies, spring model and post-operative spring opening were recorded. For each patient, two preoperative models (PREOP) were created: i) CT model and ii) S model, created by processing patient specific 3D surface scans using population averaged skin and skull thickness and suture locations. Each model was imported into ANSYS Mechanical (Analysis System Inc., Canonsburg, PA) to simulate spring expansion. Spring expansion and cranial index (CI - skull width over length) at times equivalent to immediate postop (POSTOP) and follow up (FU) were extracted and compared with in-vivo measurements. Overall expansion patterns were very similar for the 2 models at both POSTOP and FU. Both models had comparable outcomes when predicting spring expansion. Spring induced CI increase was similar, with a difference of 1.2%±0.8% for POSTOP and 1.6%±0.6% for FU. This work shows that a simplified model created from the head surface shape yields acceptable results in terms of spring expansion prediction. Further modelling refinements will allow the use of this predictive tool during preoperative planning.Spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) –insertion of metallic distractors helping skull reshaping – is a method for treating sagittal craniosynostosis, caused by premature sagittal suture closure. We present a method for predicting SAC outcomes, relying on radiation-free 3D stereophotogrammetry scans. Eight patients with preoperative CT and 3D stereophotogrammetry scans were recruited; results of spring expansion simulation were compared between models created using CT versus 3D scan data. Expansion patterns and extent of reshaping were very similar. This work proves that SAC preoperative planning can be carried out using non-ionising imaging. Further modelling refinements will allow clinical adoption of this predictive tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Begona Garate Andikoetxea & Sara Ajami & Naiara Rodriguez-Florez & N. U. Owase Jeelani & David Dunaway & Silvia Schievano & Alessandro Borghi, 2025. "Towards a radiation free numerical modelling framework to predict spring assisted correction of scaphocephaly," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 477-486, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:477-486
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2294262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2023.2294262
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2023.2294262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:477-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.