Author
Listed:
- Amir Faraji
- Mahdi Sahebi
- Sadjad SalavatiDezfouli
Abstract
Aortic aneurysm is one of the most common aortic diseases that can lead to unfortunate consequences. Numerical simulations have an important role in the prediction of the aftereffects of vascular diseases including aneurysm. In this research, numerical simulation of pulsatile blood flow is performed for a 3-dimensional patient-specific model of a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Since the choice of blood viscosity model may have a significant impact on the simulation results, the effects of four non-Newtonian models of blood viscosity namely Carreau, Casson, Herschel-Bulkley, power low, and the Newtonian model on the wall shear stress (WSS) distribution, shear rate, and oscillatory shear index (OSI) have been analyzed. Simulation results showed that all the non-Newtonian and Newtonian models generally, predict similar patterns for blood flow and shear rate. At high flow rates in the cardiac cycle, the WSS value for all the models are similar to each other except for the power-law model due to the shear thinning behavior. All models predict high values of OSI on the inner wall of the ascending aorta and broad areas of the inner wall of the aneurysm sac. However, the Newtonian model predicts the OSI less than the non-Newtonian models in some areas of the aneurysm sac. Results indicated that the Newtonian model generally can predict the hemodynamic parameters of the blood flow similar to the non-Newtonian but for more precise analysis and to predict the regions prone to rupture and atherosclerosis, choosing a proper non-Newtonian model is recommended.
Suggested Citation
Amir Faraji & Mahdi Sahebi & Sadjad SalavatiDezfouli, 2023.
"Numerical investigation of different viscosity models on pulsatile blood flow of thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) in a patient-specific model,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 986-998, June.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:8:p:986-998
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2102423
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:8:p:986-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.