Author
Listed:
- Rajesh Kumar Mohanty
- R C Mohanty
- Sukanta Sabut
- Mukundjee Pandey
Abstract
Prosthetic restoration is an important component of amputee rehabilitation which may be subjected to a static load of nearly five times of amputees’ body weight and is continuously administered to cyclic or fatigue loads during its function. This study presents a structural strength analysis of polycentric mechanical prosthetic knee commonly used in National Institutes in India by finite element simulation and its experimental validation. Static and fatigue analyses have been performed to ensure its structural integrity as per the ISO 10328:2006 standard. Accurate dimensioning of knee components have been obtained using coordinate measuring machine and the 3 D CAD model has been generated by CATIA V5 from the 2 D geometry. The model is imported to the ANSYS 20.1 workbench to study stress distribution in the knee for ensuring its safety performance. The selection of reference planes, application of calculated loads, and position of load line have been done as per the ISO test procedure. Static and cyclic loadings of 4130 N and 1230 N are applied at the top and the bottom plate is given with translational constraints to limit its movement in any direction. Results indicate that the prosthetic knee model is moderately strong enough to outstrip the static strength test. However, the calculated strain and predicted fatigue life during the cyclic test suggest that this knee unit has poor fatigue strength. Validation results with an average error percentage of 3.44 and 10 show higher reliability based on previous study results and experimental tests, respectively.
Suggested Citation
Rajesh Kumar Mohanty & R C Mohanty & Sukanta Sabut & Mukundjee Pandey, 2023.
"Conformity assessment with structural strength requirements of mechanical polycentric prosthetic knee used for amputee rehabilitation,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 764-776, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:7:p:764-776
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2088233
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:7:p:764-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.