Author
Listed:
- Kate Duquesne
- Pavel Galibarov
- Jose-de-Jesus Salazar-Torres
- Emmanuel Audenaert
Abstract
Data reduction techniques are applied to reduce the volume of data while maintaining its integrity. For cyclic motion data, a reliable overview comparing these methods is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the features of the different data reduction techniques by applying them to large public data sets. The periodicity of cyclic motion can be exploited by either analysing a single cycle or studying a series of cycles. Analysing single cycles requires a pre-processing step to isolate the amplitude variability. Three different alignment techniques were evaluated, namely Linear length normalisation (LLN), piecewise LLN (PLLN) and continuous registration (CR). CR showed to remove the most phase variation. For the data reduction, three techniques were assessed (i.e., principal component analysis (PCA), principal polynomial analysis (PPA) and multivariate functional PCA (MFPCA)) based on the in- and out-of-sample error, the compactness and the computation time. The differences were found to be minimal. From our results, PPA appeared to be most useful for data compression. Further, we recommend PCA and MFPCA for classification and feature extraction purposes. We suggest the use of PCA when computation time is key and we advise the use of MFPCA when the inclusion of different data sources is desired. In contrast, the analysis of a series of cycles requires a pre-processing step to decompose the series. Further, a regression model was used to compensate for the difference in fundamental frequency. PCA on FC and MFPCA with splines were applied on the frequency compensated curves. Both methods performed as good.
Suggested Citation
Kate Duquesne & Pavel Galibarov & Jose-de-Jesus Salazar-Torres & Emmanuel Audenaert, 2022.
"Statistical kinematic modelling: concepts and model validity,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 1028-1039, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:9:p:1028-1039
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1995722
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:9:p:1028-1039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.