Author
Listed:
- Sukirti Dhital
- Camila Rodrigues
- Yu Zhang
- Jeongho Kim
Abstract
Metal-ceramics (MC) are one of the oldest dental restorative systems, which are considered to be the gold standard for full crown restoration. Porcelain-veneered lithium disilicate (PVLD), on the other hand, are newer material systems that have shown high survival rate in clinical follow-ups but needs to be studied more. This study compares the stresses developed in the single crowns made from newer PVLD system against those with MC configuration. For this comparison, influence of the layer thickness and cooling rates is also taken into consideration. An experimentally validated viscoelastic finite element model (VFEM) has been developed to predict the stress profile in these systems. Three-dimensional rotationally symmetric crowns were analyzed using this validated model for both material systems, three veneer to core thickness ratios (2:1, 1:1, 1:2), and two cooling rates: slow cooling at 1.74E-5 W/mm2K (∼30 K/min) and fast cooling at 1.74E-4 W/mm2K (∼300 K/min). PVLD showed lower values of transient and residual stresses than MC. The maximum tensile residual stresses in MC systems were observed in the cusp area, whereas those in PVLD were located in the central fossa. With the reduction in veneer layer, there was reduction in residual stress in MC; however, the veneer thickness had little to no effect in PVLD. The effect of cooling rate was also evident as slow cooling resulted in lower residual and tensile stresses for both material systems.
Suggested Citation
Sukirti Dhital & Camila Rodrigues & Yu Zhang & Jeongho Kim, 2022.
"Metal-ceramic and porcelain-veneered lithium disilicate crowns: a stress profile comparison using a viscoelastic finite element model,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 412-423, March.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:4:p:412-423
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1955869
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:25:y:2022:i:4:p:412-423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.