Author
Listed:
- Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade
- Alana Barbosa Alves Pinto
- João Paulo Mendes Tribst
- Eliseo Pablo Chun
- Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
- Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra
Abstract
This study evaluated the polymerization shrinkage stress of three tooth preparation designs for indirect ceramic overlay by finite element analysis: isthmus preparation (IST); without isthmus preparation (wIST); and non-retentive preparation (nRET). The models were created based in prepared dental typodonts and were digitally impressed with an intraoral scanner. The interfaces in all models were considered perfectly bonded and all materials were considered homogeneous, linear, and isotropic. The polymerization shrinkage of the cement layer (100 µm) was simulated and evaluated by maximum principal stress criteria. The stress peaks followed this sequence: restoration = IST (13.4 MPa) > wIST (9.3 MPa) > nRET (9 MPa); cement layer = IST (16.9 MPa) > wIST (12.6 MPa) > nRET (10-7.5 MPa); and teeth = IST (10.7 MPa) > wIST (10.5 MPa) > (9 MPa). For the cement layer, the non-retentive preparation (nRET) had the lowest shrinkage stress from all the groups, obtaining a more homogeneous stress distribution on the cement surface. Regarding the abutment teeth, the IST generated a higher shrinkage stress area on the dental structure, concentrating higher stress magnitude at the axiopulpar and axiogingival angles. Non-retentive preparation seems to reduce polymerization shrinkage stress.
Suggested Citation
Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade & Alana Barbosa Alves Pinto & João Paulo Mendes Tribst & Eliseo Pablo Chun & Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges & Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra, 2021.
"Does overlay preparation design affect polymerization shrinkage stress distribution? A 3D FEA study,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1026-1034, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:9:p:1026-1034
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1866561
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:9:p:1026-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.