Author
Listed:
- Juan Felipe Sánchez Gutiérrez
- Mercedes Olaya-C
- Jorge Andrés Franco
- Johana Guevara
- Diego Alexander Garzón-Alvarado
- María Lucía Gutiérrez Gómez
Abstract
The umbilical cord suspends the fetus within the amniotic cavity, where fetal dynamics is one of its many functions. Hence, the umbilical cord is a viable index in determining fetal activity. Fetal movements result in mechanical loads that are fundamental for fetal growth. At present, mechanical environment during early human fetal development is still largely unknown. To determine early fetal movement dynamics at given physiological (0.060 m) and pathological umbilical cord lengths (0.030 m, 0.020 m, 0.017 m and 0.014 m) a 2D computational model was created to simulate dynamic movement conditions. Main findings of this computational model revealed the shortest umbilical cord length (0.014 m) with a 6(10−6)N, twitch force amplitude had a two-fold increase on linear velocity (0.12 m/s) in comparison with other lengths (0.05m/s). Moreover, umbilical cord length effect presented an increasing exponential tension on the fetus body wall from longest to shortest, from 0 N in the control length to 0.05 N for the shortest umbilical cord. Last, tension was always present over a period of time for the shortest cord (0.03 N to 0.08 N). Collectively, for all variables evaluated the shortest umbilical cord (0.014 m) presented remarkable differences with other lengths in particular with the second shortest umbilical cord (0.017 m), suggesting a 0.003 m difference represents a greater biomechanical effect. In conclusion, this computational model brings new insights required by clinicians, where the magnitude of these loads could be associated with different pathologies found in the clinic.
Suggested Citation
Juan Felipe Sánchez Gutiérrez & Mercedes Olaya-C & Jorge Andrés Franco & Johana Guevara & Diego Alexander Garzón-Alvarado & María Lucía Gutiérrez Gómez, 2021.
"Effect of umbilical cord length on early fetal biomechanics,"
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 91-100, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:91-100
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1811980
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:91-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.