IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v24y2021i1p67-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress distribution is susceptible to the angle of the osteotomy in the high oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): biomechanical evaluation using finite element analyses

Author

Listed:
  • Herrera-Vizcaíno Carlos
  • Baselga Lahoz Marta
  • Pelliccioni Monrroy Orlando
  • Udeabor E Samuel
  • Robert Sader
  • Lukas Benedikt Seifert

Abstract

Aim This computational study aimed to evaluate the influence of the angle of the osteotomy when performing a high oblique sagittal osteotomy over the distribution of stress to the osteosynthesis plates and mandibular segments. Material and methods: For this purpose, a finite element analysis of different combinations was carried out based on the osteotomy angle and mandibular mobilization using Autodesk Inventor® resulting in a total of 72 simulations. To check the correlation between the osteotomy angles with respect to the tension in the mandibular structure in different mobilizations, a student t-test was used. Results: The results of the advancement mobilizations (2.5 mm to 5.5 mm) reported increasing values for tension in the probe of the fourth screw and in the probe of the plate surface as the osteotomy angle increased (p-value

Suggested Citation

  • Herrera-Vizcaíno Carlos & Baselga Lahoz Marta & Pelliccioni Monrroy Orlando & Udeabor E Samuel & Robert Sader & Lukas Benedikt Seifert, 2021. "Stress distribution is susceptible to the angle of the osteotomy in the high oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): biomechanical evaluation using finite element analyses," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 67-75, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:67-75
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1810242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2020.1810242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2020.1810242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:67-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.